| Population: |
Blunt trauma patients with normal exam |
| Intervention: |
Use of Pan CT |
| Comparison: |
Selective CT use |
| Outcome: |
Diagnostic Test Characteristics, Improved Outcomes (Change in treatment plan/disposition) |
| Search Strategy: |
Pubmed; Keywords: trauma AND computed tomography AND blunt AND abdominal. |
|
| Limits: |
English, Last 5 years, adults. 222 citations found, of which the following three are selected after abstract review: |
|
| First years: |
Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 468-475.
Article critique
|
|
| Second years: |
Routine versus selective computed tomography of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine in blunt trauma: a prospective evaluation. Journal of Trauma 2009; 66: 1108-1117.
Article critique
|
|
| Third years: |
Clinical prediction rules for identifying adults at very low risk for intra- abdominal injuries after blunt trauma. Annals of Emerg Med 2009; 54: 575-584.
Article critique
|
|
1st and 2nd years use the "Diagnosis Critical Review Form" (Download) 3rd years use the "Clinical Decision Critical Review Form" (Download) |
| Extra Articles: |
Routine versus selective multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in blunt trauma patients: level of agreement on the influence of additional findings on management. J Trauma. 2009 Nov;67(5):1080-6. |
|
|
Is the use of pan-computed tomography for blunt trauma justified? A prospective evaluation. J Trauma. 2009 Oct;67(4):779-87. |